« January 2005 | Main | March 2005 »

Democracy for America DC/MD/VA Regional Caucus - This Saturday!

2005 will be a pivotal year for Democrats in Virginia.  Not only must we make sure Virginia has a Democratic governor, lieutenant governor, and attorney general, but all 100 seats in the Virginia House are up for grabs.  Democracy for Virginia believes that grassroots activists can make a significant positive impact in these races.

In order to organize Democracy for Virginia so we will be most effective this year and beyond, DFV leaders have worked with leaders from DC for Democracy and Democracy for Maryland at the behest of Democracy for America to organize a Regional Caucus this Saturday.  Please come!

Democracy for America DC/MD/VA Regional Caucus
Saturday, February 26
George Washington University’s Elliott School of International Affairs

1957E Street, NW, Suite 611 (Near Foggy Bottom Metro)

10:00 AM to 4:30 PM

Interested Virginians should attend this caucus to:

  • Participate in planning and structuring of Democracy for Virginia
  • Learn hands-on details of what works and doesn’t work in building membership in grassroots organizations, funding them, field operations and what legal structures are possible;
  • Create a loose caucus of Virginia, Maryland, and Distinct grassroots organizations that will coordinate their efforts and help channel additional resources into local races.

More information including working agenda and directions available below the jump.  We hope you will attend!

Continue reading "Democracy for America DC/MD/VA Regional Caucus - This Saturday!" »

Del. Dick "Baby Pesticides" Black says VA Senate is "Aligned With Elements of Vice"

In an extraordinary recent interview (click to listen to MP3) with the radical right-wing group Concerned Women for America regarding HB2921, Delegate Dick "Baby Pesticides" Black insults his colleagues in the Virginia Senate, claiming that they are "aligned with various elements of vice and so forth."

Thanks to the Majority Report Radio blog for the great lead on this interview.  Read below the jump for details on this remarkable interview and suggestions for follow-up items on this bill.

Continue reading "Del. Dick "Baby Pesticides" Black says VA Senate is "Aligned With Elements of Vice"" »

Senate Resoundingly Rejects Black and Marshall's Adoption Ban Bill

More good news from the Virginia Senate.  The Dynamic Duo of Discrimination, Delegate Robert Marshall and Delegate Dick "Baby Pesticides" Black, have been thwarted by the Senate in their attempt to ban adoptions by responsible gay and lesbian Virginians. 

In furthering their opinions that "having no parent is better than having a gay parent", Black and Marshall have shown that they'd prefer to leave hundreds of adoptable Virginia children stuck in the foster care system without permanent homes in order to advance their anti-gay agenda.  Thankfully, wiser legislators in the Senate Courts of Justice Committee have prevailed, soundly defeating HB2921 by voice vote yesterday.

The first roadblock that Black and Marshall faced was in the House, where the Committee on Health, Welfare, and Institutions rejected the original language of their proposed ban, which simply stated, "No person under this statute may adopt if that person is a homosexual."

The committee replaced that language with a substitute that was, presumably, considered to be slightly less hateful.  Instead of an outright ban, the committee suggested that the courts investigate "whether the petitioner is known to engage in current voluntary homosexual activity or is unmarried and cohabiting with another adult to whom he is not related by blood or marriage" in addition to the current rigorous investigation into the fitness of prospective adoptive parents. 

The revised bill passed the House 71-24.  According to the Daily Progress, this House vote was influenced by claims by Delegate Black that "29 percent of the adult children of homosexual parents had been specifically subjected to sexual molestation."

The Daily Press covers yesterday's committee hearing most dramatically, saying senators "verbally eviscerated" Delegate Black's "star witness", the pseudo-sociologist who made the dubious claims of abuse by gay parents that Black cited in his earlier House testimony.

The most hostile attacks during an hourlong hearing were levied at Black's main witness - the author of a highly criticized study that purports to show that gays and lesbians are 34 percent more likely to molest their adopted children than are straight parents.

The author of that study, Paul Cameron, who bills himself as a sociologist, also told the committee that gays and lesbians are more likely to die younger, most around age 50, and that's not good for any children they adopt.

On questioning, Cameron admitted his life-span analysis was based on reading the obituary pages of the Washington Blade, a gay and lesbian newspaper, and that his molestation statistics had been dismissed by some sociologists as scientifically suspect, based on numerous errors.

He also admitted, under harsh questioning by Howell, that he was kicked out of the American Psychological Association on ethics charges in 1983, and that in 1986 the American Sociological Association passed a resolution denying that Cameron was a sociologist and condemning his "consistent misrepresentation of sociological research."

The Roanoke Times also features detailed coverage of the hearing, including the remarkable quote from Delegate Black's star witness claiming that gays and lesbians are similar to drug addicts and prostitutes, "in a sense that they more frequently disrupt society, they less frequently contribute to society and they generally generate excessive costs for society." 

Kudos to Senator Janet Howell (D-Fairfax) for her rigorous questioning of Delegate Black's witness, to Equality Virginia for their excellent work in opposition to this bill, and to the ordinary Virginians who stood together to oppose Black and Marshall's bigotry by raising public awareness about this bill.  But the greatest thanks goes to the Senate Courts of Justice Committee for welcoming a vigorous debate on the bill and for standing up for Virginia children and families and against bigotry. 

DFV celebrates with Gov. Dean and overflow crowd!

Hundreds of supporters from Democracy for Virginia joined an overflow crowd of nearly 2,000 at Capitol City Brewery last night for a grassroots kick-off to this weekend's Democratic National Committee Winter Meeting.  (Great pics of the overflow crowd at Blog for America.)

Nearly 20 DFV volunteers helped to staff the event.  With only one day of advance notice, DFA received a remarkable number of RSVP's.  We actually had to start working crowd control nearly two hours before Gov. Dean was to arrive!  It was a magnificent testament to the grassroots energy that Governor Dean brings to his role in party leadership.  Pics below the jump!

Continue reading "DFV celebrates with Gov. Dean and overflow crowd!" »

News "flash": Senate saves VA from being "butt" of worldwide jokes

Tired of being the butt of below-the-belt jokes about the Virginia House's asinine passage of the "droopy drawers" bill, the Senate Courts of Justice Committee held a brief special session to quickly dispense of the bill on a unanimous vote.  Showing the cracks that had emerged in the previously bipartisan support for the bill, the Chairman of the committee, Senator Kenneth Stolle (R), was quoted saying:

“I think that bill is an embarrassment to Virginia, nationally and internationally...I wanted to stop the embarrassment.”

The exposure this bill received in national and international media led to the measure being dropped.   An editorial in The San Francisco Chronicle had one of the best points to make about the bill:

There is one way to ensure that low-rider pants will stay in fashion  --  and that's for adults in business suits to declare them illegal.

Thanks to the Senate Courts of Justice Committee for clearing the way for low riders to fall out of fashion, the old fashioned way.

(BTW, kudos to the Washington Post editorial page today for coming up with the most cheeky pun of all on this bill.  The Post called it a " a crotchety proposal".  Brilliant.)

Virginia House: Legislative Laughingstock of the Nation

Up here in Connecticut, where I'm taking care of my ailing elderly dad, I don't get to hear much Virginia news on the teevee.  (Thank goodness for the Internets!)

Sadly, I've seen three television reports mentioning the Virginia House of Delegates tonight - one on a New York station, one on a Connecticut station, and just now on ABC World News Tonight

Are the television stations reporting on any serious issues, such as the failure of the Virginia House to protect birth control from restrictive abortion laws, or the relentless pursuit of codified hatred of gay and lesbian Virginians by some Virginia delegates?  Nope.  What's drawn their attention is the droopy drawers bill which we discussed as a Legislative Sentry item a few weeks ago.  (Here's a sampling of newspaper coverage on this bill in USA Today and the Virginian-Pilot.)

Astonishingly, the droopy drawers bill passed the House yesterday (60-Y 34-N) with the support of many Democrats.  And so we've made national news as the legislative laughingstock of the nation.

DFV Invites You to Party With Howard Dean on Wednesday Night!

Dean_gaze

Please join grassroots activists from Democracy for Virginia, Democracy for Maryland, and DC for Democracy as we honor Howard Dean this Wednesday night at a grassroots kickoff party for the DNC Winter Meeting, which we hope and expect will culminate in the election of Howard Dean as DNC Chair!  This is a free event.

We know that this is last minute, but we hope that many of you will join us on Wednesday night to celebrate this milestone in our work together to revitalize the Democratic Party from the ground up.  Let's show Howard Dean the strength and spirit of the Virginia Democratic grassroots with a high Virginia turnout!

Democracy for Virginia, Democracy for Maryland, and DC for Democracy
cordially invite you to this special event:

Grassroots Kick-Off Party With Howard Dean
Wednesday, February 9, 2005
7:00 - 9:00 pm
Cost: FREE

Capitol City Brewery
2 Massachusetts Ave, NE
Washington, DC


Across the street from Union Station (Red Line Metro Station)
Cap City's website: http://www.capcitybrew.com/capitolhill.htm

RSVP online at: http://www.democracyforamerica.com/feb9

Democracy for Virginia still needs volunteers to serve as event leaders to help with logisitics and check-in.  Please email me if you are able to pitch in!

What we're reading in the Progressive Virginia blogosphere...

There's so much great reading in the progressive Virginia blogosphere these days!  (Check out the lnks to Virginia blogs on the right.)

An editorial in today's Richmond Times-Dispatch discusses the "worst bill" of this session of the Virginia General Assembly (via The Virginia Progressive).  The volunteer citizen sentries of Democracy for Virginia can be proud of the opening:

The competition for the worst bill of the legislative session always is fierce. Now that Delegate John Cosgrove has withdrawn his proposal requiring women to report miscarriages to the police, the smart money this year is placing bets on a couple of bills.

One of the two "runner up" bills in the editorial has also been vigorously opposed by Democracy for Virginia, the proposed ban on adoption by gay Virginians introduced by the Dynamic Duo of Discrimination, Delegate Robert Marshall and Delegate Dick "Baby Pesticides" Black.  On this bill, the Times Dispatch opines:

[T]he adoption bill...goes too far. It could prevent, for instance, the lifetime partner of a single mother from adopting her child for estate purposes. What, precisely, would be the point of that? Marshall has said the "order of Nature strongly suggests a father and mother are necessary for proper development of a child and that means a heterosexual relationship." It also means, presumably, stronger prohibitions against divorce, and -- taken to its logical conclusion -- re-assigning custody of the children of single parents to intact couples. Do Black and Marshall mean what they say, or are they once more modifying what they mean -- and in the process rendering homosexuals non-persons?

If an individual can meet all the other stringent criteria required to adopt a child, then his or her sexual orientation should not bar the door to doing so.

The Virginia Progressive has an information on the House compromise and floor debate about this bill, as well as a discussion of a thoughtful editorial in the Virginian-Pilot that correctly places the right-wing pursuit of a constitutional amendment to restrict freedom to marry in Virginia in the context of George Allen's bid for re-election to the U.S. Senate in 2006.  Republicans successfully mobilized gay-hating voters to go to the polls in states that had similar amendments on the ballot last November; it's no surprise that it would be part of George Allen's re-election strategy in '06.

There's also a great editorial ("The big nanny") in yesterday's Hampton Roads Daily Press (via Waldo Jaquith).  The opening:

Let's see here. We have bills before the General Assembly to:
Promote "traditional marriage" via license plates.
Involve the state in internal church disputes.
Ban adoptions by gay couples.
And restrict the activities of nudists.

What do you want to guess that the proponents of these bills also profess to be conservative and enthusiastic celebrants of "freedom"?

Conservatism comes in different stripes. In one place, there are libertarians, who emphasize individual rights and rigorously resist governmental intrusion into private choices. For them, government just cannot be too "hands off."

Then we have the "hands-on" conservatives. For them, public intrusion into private conduct is a way of life. Government becomes an instrument for shaping society, suppressing individualism and ordering behavior. It is the philosophy of nannyism, of "you-do-as-I-do" or else.

There seems to be a passel of the "hands-on" conservatives running around in Virginia these days, and they are well represented in the Virginia House of Delegates, the source of much of the aforementioned legislation. It's a brand of politics that is in your face, in your lives and, if need be, in your bedroom.

The whole editorial is a great read.

Finally, if you missed Saturday's Jefferson Jackson Dinner, Raising Kaine has some great, detailed reporting of impressions from the event.

DFA Meetup Members Barred from Bush's Social Security Tour

Bushbanneddfa_1We've all heard stories about how Bush campaign officials restricted access to Bush/Cheney campaign rallies to only die-hard supporters by requiring attendees to sign "loyalty oaths", removing anyone who appeared to support another candidate, even going so far as to bar a person for wearing a t-shirt in support of civil liberties.  (The ironies abound.)

Many people excused this, saying it was the campaign's right to control access to campaign events, even though some Bush appearances during the campaign from which ordinary citizens were barred for not appearing "loyal enough" were paid for by taxpayers.

But now we see the Bush administration is continuing to block access to official Presidential events, this time targeting Democracy for America Meetup members and banning them from one of his events today to promote his plan to privatize Social Security.  Yep.  They've banned us now.

The following are names of area people included on a list of those not to be admitted into the Bison Sports Arena for today's visit by President Bush, according to two unnamed officials close to the visit.

A quick search through the Internet and The Forum's archives revealed some information about the people on the list. At least 33 of the 42 people on the list are or have been members of the Fargo-Moorhead Democracy for America Meetup Group.

The group is a local progressive organization dedicated to electing fiscally responsible, socially progressive candidates in the Fargo/Moorhead area.

In addition to banning 33 Democracy for America Meetup members in Fargo, the Bush event organizers have also banned people who have written letters to the editor in the Fargo news that are critical of Bush administration policies or that support gay marriage.  One woman barred from today's Bush event is a Fargo City Commissioner, Linda Coates, who wrote a letter that said:

When the richest 2 percent of Americans are showered with huge tax cuts during wartime while our children and grandchildren are stuck with the tab - that's morally wrong.

Bush said last night that he's bringing his Social Security plan "to the people".  But it's apparent that he's simply planning another tightly-scripted propaganda tour for which the audience is not "the people", but rather "the people he's pretty sure already agree with him." 

And this time Democracy for America members are targeted for banning.  I can't help but think of Pastor Martin Niemöller's chilling poem:

First they came for the Jews
and I did not speak out
because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for the Communists
and I did not speak out
because I was not a Communist.
Then they came for the trade unionists
and I did not speak out
because I was not a trade unionist.
Then they came for me
and there was no one left
to speak out for me.

Thanks to the Internet, we can still speak out.  Thanks to Meetups, we can still find each other.  They're targeting us now.  Will you speak out before it is too late?

Can't you just hear the questioning at a new House Committee on Un-American Activities Committee Meeting?

"ARE YOU NOW, OR HAVE YOU EVER BEEN, A MEMBER OF A DEAN FOR AMERICA OR DEMOCRACY FOR AMERICA MEETUP GROUP?"

Speak out now.

HB1660: Plated Haters Win in House

HB1660, Delegate L. Scott Lingamfelter's bill in support of "Traditional Marriage" license plates, moved one step closer to becoming law, having passed the House today on a vote of 62-35.

Since that number is so close to the partisan split in the house, one might expect it was a party-line vote, but 20 delegates voted opposite to the majority of their parties.  10 Democrats voted with the majority of Republicans supporting the plate, and 10 Republicans joined the majority of Democrats in standing against the plate, which many supporters of equal rights for all Virginians consider a thinly-veiled slogan in opposition to equal rights for gay Virginians. 

More on the vote after the jump.

One interesting twist this week was Delegate Brian Moran's attempt to amend HB1660 to remove the word "traditional".  Until 1967, Virginia's marriage "traditions" included laws preventing interracial marriage.  In this context, a different plate, one commemorating the decision of Loving v. Virginia, which freed Virginians from anti-miscegenation laws, would be far more fitting and appropriate.  More after the jump.

Continue reading "HB1660: Plated Haters Win in House" »