Thanks to the efforts of Waldo Jaquith and Chad Dotson (aka John Behan), the esteemed Sorensen Institute for Political Leadership at University of Virginia will be offering the first Summit on Blogging and Democracy in the Commonwealth on August 27.
The mission of the summit is twofold:
1)To promote commonwealth over partisanship among political bloggers in Virginia.
2)To explore efforts to regulate political blogging.
After pasting the first objective above, I had to chuckle when I clicked on over to John Behan's site to create the link to his site and saw that his topmost post read:
Leftist morons like Paul Begala and Howard Dean are trying awfully hard to make sure that the Democratic Party becomes a permanent minority party.
Commonwealth over partisanship, indeed. ;-)
Seriously, this summit holds great promise, and its success depends on far more than the fine organizers who have put it together - it depends on all of us in the Virginia political blogosphere, from bloggers to commenters to lurkers - participating actively. From the press release:
"Part of the Sorensen Institute's mission is to promote civility in politics. Bloggers play an important role in educating the voters," explained Sorensen Institute Executive Director Sean O'Brien. "We hope that by bringing bloggers of all political stripes together that we can promote a civil discourse of the important issues facing the Commonwealth."
"It is becoming increasingly evident that bloggers will be playing a significant role in the political process over the next few years," said Chad Dotson, Commonwealth's Attorney for Wise County and the City of Norton. In addition to his duties as a prosecutor, Dotson writes for Commonwealth Conservative, a blog about Virginia politics. "For some time, it has been my desire to see Virginia bloggers step to the forefront in promoting an atmosphere where bloggers can help move Virginia forward on issues important to us all, rather than engaging in partisan bickering. I'm very pleased that the Sorensen Institute is taking on this project, and I look forward to attending."
"Blogs have become a promising medium for involving more ordinary Virginians in the political process," says Maura Keaney, a blogger and board member of Democracy for Virginia PAC. "We've only seen the tip of the iceberg in terms of how blogs can be used to inform, include, and empower voters in Virginia."
"This conference comes at an ideal time in the growth of the Virginia political 'blogosphere,'" continued Keaney, "It will allow bloggers on all parts of the ideological spectrum to come together and discuss blogging as a medium before we head into the fall elections in Virginia."
A day packed with serious agenda items will be followed by an evening of bipartisan socializing. And we all know that's where the real drama will be, right? Will fans of "leftist morons" like Howard Dean be able to get along with bloggers who call Dean a leftist moron? Will anonymous bloggers wear paper bags over their heads like the Unknown Comic? If the stereotype of the blogger is someone who blogs all night in his underwear eating Cheetos in his mom's dark basement, will the entire social event collapse from a collective lack of social skills? Will blog commenters wait for bloggers to start the conversations before speaking up?
Don't miss the drama. Sign up!
Hey, right after I posted about the conference, I caught myself starting to post something nasty and partisan, and stopped myself.
Old habits die hard!
Posted by: Waldo Jaquith | July 16, 2005 at 10:27 AM
Now I'm dying to see who shows up with a bag on his/her head.
Posted by: kathy | July 17, 2005 at 10:01 AM
Yes,;-)
Any time I hear the suggestion that bloggers (or anyone else should just be "civil," I hear the old trap. They hope we progressives will fall all over ourselves playing nice and the other side will pummel us to death. What's now defined as uncivil is anything remotely criticizing The House of Bush. Call me "not buyin it." I'll not be defined by or restricted by these guys without goin down speaking out.
Posted by: KathyinBlacksburg | July 17, 2005 at 10:22 AM
One more thing... The fact that this conference is being organized shows the power of bloggers. Politicians and "MSM" (yeh, I know, it's not really so main stream)journalists alike have found us a force to contend with. Hmmm... So, why then should we contribute to our own regulation and extinction? It's one more way that the GOP stranglehold of everything that walks, moves, or speaks will be expanded.
Posted by: KathyinBlacksburg | July 17, 2005 at 10:28 AM
Before you chuckle yourself to death, you might want to enlighten us as to your opinion of the comments made by Begala and Dean about which Behan was commenting. If you don't condemn them, then you apparently limit your contempt for harsh partisanship to that demonstrated when Republicans respond to Democrats.
Posted by: James Young | July 18, 2005 at 03:56 PM
Any time I hear the suggestion that bloggers (or anyone else should just be "civil," I hear the old trap. They hope we progressives will fall all over ourselves playing nice and the other side will pummel us to death.
They is me and, as one of those progressives, no, I have no such hope.
So, why then should we contribute to our own regulation and extinction?
If we don't determine how to regulate ourselves, I guarantee you that we'll be regulated externally, eventually, by somebody, only we won't have any say in it. Most industries (videogame, movie, music, etc.) have the good sense to take up self-regulation when threatened with external regulation. We can follow the clear path, or just wait for it to happen and then gripe a lot about it in retrospect.
The time of trial is always. Now is the appointed time.
Posted by: Waldo Jaquith | July 23, 2005 at 12:03 AM
Waldo - I don't understand your analogy between personal weblogging and other 'industries' and why, therefore, you think that any regulatory activity would be similar.
Mind you, I do not accept the premise that webloggers are, by definition, "journalists" either. (Some are, some aren't.)
Generally, though, I just don't buy that what an individual says in an email or on their website should be subject to any sort of speech regulation. I'm rather fond of the First Amendment.
Posted by: Medley | August 06, 2005 at 07:03 PM
Maura, what felicitious timing. I just checked in for the first time in *months*, and happened to read about the conference in time to meet the registration deadline.
Sorry I've been hard to reach--I've been sick for months. I'm not great but doing somewhat better at the moment.
I look forward to seeing you and hopefully getting some catching up time!
Posted by: Shaula Evans | August 13, 2005 at 12:53 AM
it was a call to action wasn't it!
Posted by: VA Loan | December 29, 2007 at 03:26 AM